Good:
http://www.catalogtree.net/projects/largest_metropolitan_areas?t=information_design
These infographs involve the population of the largest metropolitan areas. One part shows how many people entered cities per hour that uses arrows to show the amount of people coming into the cities. One is a scatter plot of most populated metro areas from 2006 which can be compared to the scatter plot from 1990.Both of these are basic scatter plots but can be easily compared. Another one shows population density which is actually denser than the other scatter plots used here, driving the feeling of density. The scatter plots used here are really varied.
http://www.catalogtree.net/projects/the_phaidon_atlas?t=information_design
The Infographs from The Phaidon Atlas is actually kind of interesting. It shows the location of building across the world. The map is made of pixel like triangles which each continent with a different color. The black pixels are the building and the key is on the bottom of the page. Some buildings are really close together which is why there are some keys around the continents in order to show the clustered buildings. I think this is a decent way to show this much information on a small page. It’s as good as it gets without going to another page.

http://www.catalogtree.net/projects/the_build_network?t=information_design
The infographs from The Build Network comparing the Walt Disney organization are pretty good. There is a cart that compares percentages through a circle graph made of colored lines which is effective as well as refreshing because it’s not just a simple pie chart which would usually be used here. There is also a series of 3D bar graphs which is also different but can also compared a lot more information easily and clearly.
Bad:

http://www.catalogtree.net/projects/mediafonds?t=information_design
These infograph from Mediafonds could be better. I find it hard to understand what they are comparing. There are blue lines that stretch from the center to the edge of the page but there isn’t anything really telling what each line represents. There are small numbers on the edge of the page showing the amount that each line represents but that doesn’t excuse the lack of understanding the comparison.


http://www.catalogtree.net/projects/the_architect_50_methodology?t=information_design
The infograhs used here at Architect 50 are interesting. To show percentages the have a circle made of smaller circles which are just strokes but are filled in as the percentage rises. Another way they show info is through line graphs. I think these are not as effective as the circle graphs. These are just too cramped and hard to follow because they are comparing too many firms, but it would probably work really well if there was less things to compare.

http://www.catalogtree.net/projects/interstellar_overdrive?t=information_design
This infograph from Interstellar Overdrive shows a subjective classification of guitar players depending on their scores at the five categories: Volume, Shreditude, Technique, Emotion and Originality. I find the infographic a little cramped. I also wish that there was more room to show the score of each category. There is only so much room for each star which could use more room in order to show more of a difference in score.

















